Notification is not required if an investigation determines that there is no reasonable likelihood to the affected individuals has resulted or will result from the information’s loss and the Attorney General is informed of this fact in writing.Acquisition can include paper-based methods. Enacted in 2008, Alaska’s data breach notification legislation requires entities that own or license the personal information of Alaska residents to notify them without unreasonable delay of any data breach that results or could result in the unauthorized acquisition of their personal information.Failure to properly notify can result in additional penalties of up to $5,000 per day for each consecutive day there is a failure to comply with notification provisionsĪlaska Statutes 45.48.010: Personal Information Protection Act Civil penalties as high as $500,000 per breach are stipulated. They must still provide written notice to the Alabama Attorney General when the number of individuals the entity notified exceeds 1,000. Entities in compliance with relevant federal and state regulations, HIPAA or the GLBA are deemed to comply with this law.Substitute notice is permitted in specific circumstances and notification may be delayed for law enforcement purposes.If more than 1,000 individuals must be notified of a breach, breached entities must also notify the Attorney General, and all consumer reporting agencies that compile and maintain files on consumers on a nationwide basis, as defined in 15 U.S.C.Breached third parties must notify the relevant data owners or licensees within 10 days.Notification is not required if it is determined the breach is not reasonably likely to cause substantial harm to affected individuals. Notification in writing must be made as expeditiously as possible and without unreasonable delay, and no later than 45 days of receipt of notice of the breach.Enacted in 2018, Alabama’s data breach notification legislation requires entities that acquire or use “sensate personally identifying information” of Alabama residents to notify affected individuals of any unauthorized acquisition of data.Certain STDs can increase HIV viral load and genital HIV shedding, which may increase the risk of sexual and perinatal HIV transmission. However, if a patient with HIV presents with either of these STDs, it is important that you alert health departments of this co-infection with HIV to ensure appropriate follow up with potentially exposed partners. Patients With HIV Who Present With Gonorrhea or Chlamydiaĭue to resource limitations, health departments do not always follow up on cases of gonorrhea or chlamydia. For the partner who may have been exposed, this method facilitates quick access to testing and linkage to care for treatment and other services. 1 For patients, this method helps maintain their anonymity and relieves them of the burden of disclosure.Īdditionally, health departments link patients to other resources, such as counseling and risk-reduction services. When health departments take responsibility for notification, more partners are successfully notified of their possible exposure. Health department staff are there to help your patient during the process and provide partners with information and access to counseling, testing, and other resources.īest Practice: The Health Department Informs Partners.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |